The Preservation of Native American Folklore: Analyzing Archives of the Kiowa Tribe
The
Preservation of Native American Folklore: Analyzing Archives of the Kiowa Tribe
Collective memory, in respect to social memory
(sociology), is how a group remembers. Through the process of preservation
(what kind of things get preserved, stored, and saved), stories and rituals are
able to be told for generations. Communicative memory is folklore that is told
and retold without artifactual figures. Communicative memory is more adaptive,
prone to getting lost, and prone to getting changed because there is no
institution to archive said folklore (Edy, 03-14-22). This raises the question of
how indigenous cultures go generations of preserving folklore, stories, and
rituals through the word of mouth. According to David L. Moore in “Rough
Knowledge and Radical Understanding: Sacred Silence in American Indian
Literature”,
The four literary
elements (myth, relationality on the land, mundane cultural description, and
rhetorical silence) have worked for generations against a contextual historical
problem in relation to reading Native American literature: the conflation of
colonialism and capitalism, which has commodified and fetishized American
Indians beyond recognition. The forces of this history work so powerfully on
both readers and writers of American Indian self-representations that it takes
persistent effort to elude the nuanced pressures of that perennial American
icon, the “vanishing Indian.” The incongruous perseverance of this tragic
figure eclipses the cultural survival of many Indian communities and identities
which would give the lie to the “vanish” stereotype (American Indian
Quarterly, 1997).
Native
American cultures have the historical context of experiencing genocide and
being silenced through the process of colonization. The importance of folklore,
stories, rituals, and practices have preserved the communicative memory in
Native American cultures, despite the attempt of silence. This paper will concentrate
on the Kiowa Tribe as it looks at how the Native American stories told in the
present effects the past, how Native American folklore has been archived, and
how Native American cultures are portrayed. The qualitative process of
conducting research for this paper contains one on one interviews from members
of the Kiowa Tribe, Cheryl Bearbow Dezell and Miles Pocowatchit, as well as,
analyzing Kiowa literature to provide a better understanding of the Native
American practices and rituals of the Kiowa Tribe.
To begin, it is important to
consider the historical context of the Kiowa Tribe. Dennis W. Zotigh of Indian
Country Today interviewed the Kiowa Business Committee Chairman of the Kiowa
Tribe, Amber C. Toppah, where she states, “My Kiowa name is Ay-Keen-Geh-Ah-Lay,
meaning Charging after the Enemy. It was given to me by my grandfather Frank
Kaubin and grandmother Georgia Duppoint in 1994. I am a great-great-great
granddaughter of Chief Satanta (White Bear), and Ay-Keen-Geh-Ah-Lay was the
name of his eldest daughter” (Zotigh, 2018). Toppah explained, “The Kiowas were
originally from the Yellowstone National Park area. Our history says that the
tribe broke in two with some members remaining there and others traveling south
to Indian Territory, now Oklahoma” (Zotigh, 2018). As the Kiowa tribe is now spread
out throughout the nation, primarily the southwest region of Oklahoma; Elgin,
Oklahoma was the first location to teach Native American curriculum in their
public schools. Originally taught and offered by Rita Quoetone Gaddy,
grandmother of Amber C. Toppah and Miles Pocowatchit, mother of Cheryll Bearbow
Dezell, students at Elgin Public School have the privilege to learn about the
Native American culture. “Kiowa Voices: Myths, Legends, and Folktales”,
written by Maurice Boyd, is a Kiowa Literature book used to teach students
about Kiowa history. Miles Pocowatchit, current educator of Native American
history at Elgin Public Schools, claims he utilizes Kiowa Voices in his
lesson plans often to provide an engaging class discussion. Author Maurice Boyd
introduces Kiowa Voices with the history of preserving the Kiowa
stories, stating:
In 1970 some Kiowa elders, headed by James Auchiah and Linn Pauahty, expressed concern over the permanent loss of Kiowa folklore and history as the tribal elders passed away. Observing that much Kiowa lore was recorded only in the minds of tribal society to preserve a permanent record of their cultural heritage. The project for the preservation of Kiowa history and culture was approved by the Tribal Council in 1974, and the Kiowa Historical and Research Society was officially incorporated in 1975 by the State of Oklahoma (Boyd, 1983).
Through
the collection of stories shared from family members and compacted in Kiowa
Voices, insight is given to the Kiowa rituals and practices. Considering that
many of the Kiowa folklore resembles a mythic past (not real in fact but real
in consequences), in addition to the non-fictional historical stories,
presentism is applicable to Native American folklore. Presentism is the idea
that the morals and values in the present gets applied to the past. Pocowatchit
describes the stories in Kiowa Voices as sometimes “silly”, but it is
the moral message in the context of these stories that teaches a lesson of
consequence for adolescents to interpret. In “Migration as Creation. The Case
of Two Native American Creation Stories”, written by Codrut Serban, Serban
suggests the “creation myths represented the cultural and historical foundation
of traditional Native American cultures” and later explains that “the main
function of creation stories was to teach and to instruct rather than to
entertain, so retelling or passing on the fundamental truth(s) was the main
motivation behind the didactic role of storytelling which was always imbued
with sacred elements” (Serban, 2020). Most importantly, Serban states that “The
community”, Native American tribes, “felt the need to reassert the originary
pillars upon which it had evolved, find symbolic shelter in that common body of
knowledge, and use the story as an instrument of cultural and historical
resistance and/or survival. Creation stories form of sacred truth which, was
believed, could guarantee survival when history seemed to come to its end”
(Serban, 2020). These stories represent the cultural identity of the Kiowa
tribe. In the search for identity in Kiowa Voices, it is said that “The
Kiowa person had no existence apart of the tribal community. The person was
spiritually interdependent upon the language, folk history, ceremonial ritual,
and the sacred tribal relation to nature. No one and nothing existed in
isolation” (page 273, Kiowa Voices). Amber Toppah brings perspective to this
while discussing her life experience, stating “I never knew as I was growing
up, being raised by my grandma and grandpa, that I was being groomed to have a
role in leadership in the government sector” (Zotigh, 2018). Toppah continues,
“I thought I knew where I was going. I said I would never go back to Meers,
Oklahoma, never work for a tribe, and never be in politics. Today I live in
Meers, I’ve worked for the Kiowa Casino, and I am in tribal politics” (Zotigh,
2018). The strong connection that Kiowa tribal members have to their culture
forever links the present to the cultural lore of their past as a moral compass
in navigating their life experiences.
All things considered, the process
of archiving Native American stories and histories have shifted to a more
tactile process compared to the abstract word-of-mouth storytelling. The very
publication of Kiowa Voices, amongst other Native American literature,
is a significant shift to preserving Kiowa lore and has expanded the ability to
learn about Kiowa culture if one chooses to engage with the literature. It is
stated, “observing that much Kiowa culture was recorded only in the minds of
tribal storytellers, and handed down as oral tradition, the Kiowas formed a
society to preserve a permanent record of their cultural heritage” (page 2,
Boyd, 1983). However, the traditional communicative memory will always be the
main process of sharing Kiowa folklore. By the means of ceremonies, rituals, or
storytelling, Kiowa tribal members are the gatekeepers of Kiowa history and
preserve the information to transfer the message amongst others. Pocowatchit
recalls always being taught about his Kiowa culture from family members and
compares this process of deliberation to resemble the “telephone game”. Stories
can be passed from individual but is susceptible to being misinterpreted along
the lines of spreading a message through the word of mouth. Cheryll Bearbow
Dezell, World History educator at Elgin Public Schools, tells a similar
narrative of the process of sharing stories. Dezell mentioned that if
information were to be shared, an individual would be sent off to share that
information or story. That said, as gatekeepers of the Kiowa culture, tribal
members had the advantage to inform whom they choose and misdirect individuals
with faulty information, if necessary, in order to protect their land, culture,
and heritage. In Kiowa Voices, the importance of interpreting and
preserving Kiowa history explains the emotional response to colonization of
European culture:
The growth and
evolution of the Kiowa tribal character is reflected in the myths and
folktales, and tribal psychology is especially reflected through the mythic
Saynday. The existence of Saynday (Sendi) stories was first recorded by James
Mooney in the Calendar History of the Kiowa Indians, Bereau of American
Ethnology Annual report 17, pt. 2. (Washington, D.C., Government Printing
Office, 1892), following his studies on the Oklahoma reservation.
Thirty-five years later, in November and December of 1927, Elsie Clews Parsons
collected several Saynday (Sendeh) tales. These were published in 1929 in
Memoirs of the American Folklore Society, Volume XXII (New York G. E.
Stechert and Company, 1929). From 1934 through 1936, Alice Marriott
recorded native Kiowa stories and eventually published some Saynday tales in
her Winter-Telling Stories (New York: Tomas Y. Crowell, 1947): they were
reprinted in 1963, together with some previously published Plains Indian lore,
under the title of Saynday’s People in the Bison Book Series (Lincon:
University Nebreska Press, 1963). In American Indian Mythology (New
York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1968), Alice Marriott and Carol K. Rachlin
recorded an isolated Saynday story about the origin of death. Other versions of
the same tales have occasionally appeared in newspapers and journals. The
foregoing publications about Saynday were recorded and published by white
people. Each is a version taken orally from an individual Kiowa. Some of the
tales were either abbreviated or embellished by the teller, and often the
cultural significance was not made clear (xxvi, Boyd, 1983).
This
is an important, informative chronological understanding of how Kiowa stories
were preserved by some individuals. Most significantly, the last sentence in
the passage proclaims the embellished interpretations from white people. The
gatekeeper of the archive tells a narrative from their perspective and when the
perspective is detached from the cultural roots, it loses saliency in
authenticity. The story of the mythic Saynday represents the Kiowa culture hero
as a beacon of light to help the Kiowa tribe process the trauma of genocide to
Native American. It is mentioned in Kiowa Voices that “the tribal
frustrations and depression, the grasping for new hope through the Feather
(Ghost) Dance, and the struggle for identity are revealed in their folktales.
New Saynday stories reflected the Kiowa response to their confrontation with
the white man and his culture, and peyote stories suggest the outcome” (xxvi,
Boyd, 1983). Pocowatchit even recalls his earliest tribal meeting was a Peyote
meeting at age 8. Peyote is a cactus that is “both used as a sacrament and as a
medicine for many kinds of illness” (page 276, Boyd, 1983). The
importance of conducting ceremonies and rituals connects the Kiowa community to
embrace their cultural identity, pass down folklore, and mourn the historical
trauma of their ancestors. It is essential for the authenticity of the stories,
rituals, and folklore stays true to the Native American culture and each of the
tribe’s history. As Native American literature continues to be published in
effort to archive and preserve Native American cultures, representing these
stories in a way that illuminates the contexts of the emotional trauma, ways to
live, and ways to cope will allow future generations to conceptualize the
hardships that Native Americans faced.
Furthermore, the narrative of how
Native American stories are told can bring perspective of Native American
cultures to members of different ethnicities and cultural identities. As
mentioned prior, Native Americans are often fetishized and misrepresented. In
modern day media, there is little Native American representation and when there
is representation, Native Americans are commonly represented as caricatures.
For example, Kenzie Allen, a descendant of the Oneida Tribe of Wisconsin,
expresses her opinion of the media’s portrayal of Native Americans, stating:
I’ve
struggled with Disney’s Pocahontas as a source of pain and
stereotype. Both Pocahontas and Sacagawea are often held up as heroines in the
Western perspective, their stories reduced to kinder details rather than
serving the interest of the dominant culture. Yes, there is visibility in
telling their stories, but it is a tainted visibility, a false reality rendered
through the dominant culture, which seeks to ameliorate, always, the horrific
methods by which they came to occupy an entire nation’s worth of landmass
(Bodenner, The Atlantic, 2015).
This is problematic for Native American cultures because
representation in popular culture is what becomes salient in what people
commemorate (Edy, 04-08-22). John Coward, a professor at the
University of Tulsa, examined how Native American life is portrayed in
literature, The Good Red Road (published in 1987) and Rez Life
(published in 2012) where he asked “How did these writers approach Native
Americans and Native American life? How did they portray Native Americans? What
stories did they emphasize or ignore? Finally, how successfully did these
writers make sense of the Native American people?” (Coward, 2018). What Coward
found was that “non-Native Americans have been mostly wrong about Native
Americans and Native American lives since the English settlement of Jamestown
in 1607. From then to now, Euro-American ideas about Native Americans have been
shaped by racial myths and misinformation, most of which have been produced and
perpetuated by media and popular culture” (Coward, 2018). The Good Red Road mentions
the sociological problems in Native American communities involving alcoholism,
economic poverty, and racial discrimination in which Native Americans are
represented as “a dirty Indian” (Coward, 2018). In Rez Life, it is
mentioned that “most often rez life is associated with tragedy. We are thought
of in terms of what we have lost or what we have survived. What one finds on
reservations is more than scars, tears, blood, and noble sentiment. There is
beauty in Indian life, as well as meaning” (Coward, 2018). Anne E. Pettinger
confronts these disparities through her journalistic field research observing
Native American cultures at the Rocky Boy’s Reservation in Montana. Pettinger
discovers that “we expected that stories of racially motivated conflicts and
tension would be dew and far between on our first visit to Rocky Boy’s
Reservation. What we found instead is that everyone spoke with had a story to
tell about local racism. Joe Big Knife recounted an incident at a Havre store
that he felt humiliated his family” (Pettinger, 2005). As modern media and film
break the barriers of ethnic representation and authentically portray Native
Americans true to their heritage, non-Native American individuals can remove
their blinders of racial discrimination and stereotypes and become enriched
with the cultural foundation of the American soil. In addition, representing
Native American cultures authentically in modern day media shapes how future
generations preserving Native American life.
In conclusion, as Treuer proclaims
in Writing from the Indigenous Edge: Journeys into the Native American
Experience, “to understand American Indians is to understand America,
Indians, after all, were the first Americans and they have something to
contribute to the larger American story” (Coward, 2018). It is incredibly
valuable, salient, and sacred to preserve Native American cultures.
Communicative memory through the process of folklore, ceremonies, rituals, and
stories represents the Native American cultural identity. Future generations experience
the practices of their tribe, they can interpret the contexts of the messages
within the stories as a moral compass grounding them to the roots of their
heritage. The process of archiving these stories should be diligent to the
story’s authenticity. For generations, stories, and lore were passed by
word-of-mouth and preserved as Native Americans were the gatekeepers of their
culture’s historical information. Unfortunately, as tribal elders pass, their
internal archive passes along with them. The movement to tactically archive
Native American lore allows permanent perceptions of history to be stored for
future generations to learn. In addition, properly archiving Native American
stories (in that, it appropriately portrays Native American life) in literature
and media has consequences of how Native Americans are perceived. Portraying
Native Americans as caricatures fuels negative stereotypes with repercussions
of discrimination against the Native American community. According to the
Migration Memorials Project, “a poll released by NPR revealed that 55% of
Native Americans living in tribal communities say they have been discriminated
against when interacting with police and 54% when applying for jobs”
(Recognizing the Marginalization of indigenous people, 2017). Pettinger even
encounters this while conducting her field research, stating “where some Native
Americans felt they were treated unfairly because of the color of their skin.
Those tensions were most evident at retail stores, bars, and restaurants”
(Pettinger, 2005). Forevermore, the American soil belongs to the Native
American history first and foremost. It crucial that the historical American archive
represents the Native American cultures respectfully as such.
References
Bodenner, C.
(2015, June 30). Does Disney's Pocahontas do more harm than good? The
Atlantic. Retrieved May 5, 2022, from https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/06/pocahontas-feminism/397190/
Boyd, M., & Pauahty, L.
(1981). Kiowa voices. Texas Christian University Press.
Coward, J. M. (2018). Writing from
the (Indigenous) Edge: Journeys into the Native American Experience. Literary Journalism Studies, 10(1), 26–35.
Moore, D. L. (1997). Rough Knowledge and Radical
Understanding: Sacred Silence in American Indian Literatures. American
Indian Quarterly, 21(4), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.2307/1185717
Pettinger,
A. E. (2005). A Student’s Most Memorable Story. Nieman
Reports, 59(3), 38–41.
Recognizing
the marginalization of indigenous people. Recognizing the Marginalization
of Indigenous People | Duke Migration Memorials. (n.d.). Retrieved May 5, 2022,
from https://migrationmemorials.trinity.duke.edu/recognizing-marginalization-indigenous-people
ŞERBAN, C. (2020).
Migration as Creation. The Case of Two Native American Creation Stories. Meridian Critic, 35(2), 75–81.
Zotigh, D.
W. (2013, November 27). Amber C. Toppah, Committee chairman: Nmai's meet
Native America Series. Indian Country Today. Retrieved May 5, 2022, from
https://indiancountrytoday.com/archive/amber-c-toppah-committee-chairman-nmais-meet-native-america-series
Comments
Post a Comment